dam ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 25-.
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Xiu-lin, LV Xiao-bin and PENG Yun-feng
Received:
Online:
Published:
李秀琳1,2,吕小彬1,2,彭云枫3
作者简介:
基金资助:
Abstract: The overall security and stability of cemented sand and gravel dam are better by using the symmetric trapezoidal profile, but the toe and the foundation of the dam are fragile. In order to analyze the safety of cemented sand and gravel dam, the stress of a cemented sand and gravel dam with 100 m in height and the comparison with gravity dam are analyzed under three water levels. And the anti-shear and anti-sliding stability analyses of these two dams are carried out by introducing the stress level and point safety factor method. The results show that the safety of cemented sand and gravel dam is better than the gravity dam with the same elevation, the stress is less affected by water load, the stress level distribution is more reasonable and the safety factor is higher under the same foundation conditions.
Key words: cemented sand and gravel dam, stress analysis, stress level, safety analysis
摘要: 采用对称梯形剖面的胶凝砂砾石坝整体安全稳定性较高,但在不同结构破坏方法作用下,坝趾、坝基面部位较为脆弱。为具体分析胶凝砂砾石坝的安全特性,针对某100 m级胶凝砂砾石坝,以等高程重力坝作为参照,设计三种水位工况,计算分析不同荷载作用下两种坝型的应力情况,并引入应力水平、点安全系数法分析两种坝型的抗剪、抗滑稳定情况。分析结果表明胶凝砂砾石坝安全性优于等高程重力坝,主要表现为应力受水荷载影响较小,应力水平分布合理,同等地基条件下安全系数较高。
关键词: 胶凝砂砾石坝, 应力分析, 应力水平, 安全分析
LI Xiu-lin, LV Xiao-bin and PENG Yun-feng. Safety analysis of cemented sand and gravel dam considering different stress levels[J]. dam, 2015, 0(4): 25-.
李秀琳,吕小彬,彭云枫. 考虑应力水平的胶凝砂砾石坝安全分析[J]. 大坝与安全, 2015, 0(4): 25-.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://magtech.dam.com.cn/EN/
http://magtech.dam.com.cn/EN/Y2015/V0/I4/25